Who is dusko tadic

Pursuant to his request, the Appeals Chamber ordered that the appeal be joined with the Appeal against the Sentencing Judgment of 14 July The Appeals Chamber rendered its judgment on 26 January ; it upheld the convictions for war crimes and crimes against humanity, but found that the trial Chamber had erred in the sentencing. Hence, the prison sentence was reduced to twenty years. The Appeals Chamber dismissed the request on 30 July On 24 May , the nearby town of Kozarac Bosnia and Herzegovina was attacked, resulting in the killing of some civilians, and the removal of non-Serbs from the town.

During the attack on Kozarac, non-Serb civilians were beaten, robbed and murdered by the Serb forces. After the takeover of Prijedor and the surrounding areas, the Serb forces detained non-Serb civilians in three major prison camps: the Omarska, Keraterm, and Trnopolje camps all near Prijedor, Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Those who were detained were subjected to beatings, sexual assaults, torture, executions, and psychological abuse. The reason for this lies in the widespread or systematic scale and the quantity of the crimes, having a qualitative impact on the nature of the offence which is seen as a crime against humanity as a whole.

The amended indictment was filed on 14 December The Appeals Chamber remitted the issue of sentence concerning the additional counts to a Trial Chamber to be designated by the President of the Tribunal. On 11 November , Trial Chamber II bis rendered its sentencing judgment on the additional counts, imposing a sentence of 25 years of imprisonment. Pursuant to his request, the Appeals Chamber ordered that the appeal be joined with the Appeal against the Sentencing Judgment of 14 July The Appeals Chamber rendered its judgment on 26 Juanuary ; it upheld the convictions for war crimes and crimes against humanity, but found that the trial Chamber had erred in the sentencing.

Hence, the prison sentence was reduced to twenty years. Of particular concern here is the cruelty and humiliation inflicted on the victim and the other detainees involved". Beating of Sefik Sivac in the "white house" of Omarska camp: "of particular concern here is the severity of the beating inflicted Omarska camp: "while Dusko Tadic was not found guilty of having killed any of the prisoners, his participation in the beating of the prisoners encouraged the beating of other prisoners by camp guards and visitors in such circumstances that death could and in fact did result, which aggravates the nature of his crime".

Beating of Hase Icic and other prisoners in the "white house" of Omaraska camp: "of particular concern here is the use of whips, iron bars and other instruments to inflict great suffering on the victim, as well as his terrorising and near suffocation through the use of a noose. Once again, the cruelty of the attack weighs heavily in any consideration of the appropriate sentence".

Jaskici and Sivci: Dusko Tadic has been found guilty "of having beaten None of the witnesses have seen the men removed from the village since that day". They represent a major demonstration of a pattern of conduct consisting of extreme violence against non-Serbs and a flagrant disregard for human life and the suffering of others.

Dusko Tadic bears full responsibility for the deaths and the extremely violent and cruel in which they were caused". The Trial Chamber has taken into account the willing participation of Dusko Tadic in the persecution of non-Serbs in opstina Prijedor generally, including his membership of the SDS, his espousal of ethnic and religious discrimination and nationalist sentiments and his participation in the crimes Dusko Tadic "was well aware of the horrific conditions at the camps established by Bosnian Serbs authorities in opstina Prijedor and the inhuman treatment of the detainees This awareness and support, manifested in his actions, gave rise to Dusko Tadic's liability for crimes against humanity rather than just war crimes, and is a significant factor in the imposition of sentence However this, if anything, aggravates more than it mitigates: for such a man to have committed these crimes requires an even greater evil will on his part than that of a lesser man".

His relative unimportance is made clear by the steps taken by the local Bosnian serb authorities to call him up as an ordinary soldier and his eventual flight from" the area. Accepting that "the modern philosophy of penology [is] that the punishment should fit the offender and not merely the crime", the Trial Chamber has taken into account:.

This is not to say that his criminal responsibility is to be measured by a comparison with the alleged acts of other persons known and unknown to the Trial Chamber